As nations compete to protect strategic knowledge, a parallel race is accelerating across the world. The future of technological leadership may depend not only on safeguarding research, but on attracting and retaining the scientists who create tomorrow’s breakthroughs.
Latest Articles
Stay up to date with the latest reporting, analysis and commentary shaping Asia and the wider Indo-Pacific..
Samsung reported record profits and investors responded by selling. The reaction may reveal less about semiconductor demand itself and more about a changing market psychology as the AI economy moves from deployment towards productivity.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is often measured in market share and production capacity. Yet its deeper significance lies elsewhere: in the concentration of expertise, institutions and industrial coordination that increasingly defines technological power in the twenty-first century.
China’s rise challenges one of the most enduring assumptions of the modern era: that economic development inevitably follows a Western path. As China’s influence expands through infrastructure, technology and institutions, a deeper question is emerging. Can there be more than one path to modernity?
Why does Europe increasingly describe competition with China as unfair? The answer extends beyond tariffs, subsidies or trade disputes. At its core lies a deeper question: what happens when two fundamentally different economic systems compete within the same global marketplace?
Many observers focus on China’s government or its companies. Yet understanding modern China requires examining the institution that connects them. The Communist Party functions not only as a political organisation, but also as a coordinating mechanism that links state institutions, economic development and long-term national priorities.
